| Credits | |||||||||
| Released: | 1987 (37 years ago) | ||||||||
| Publisher: | US Gold | ||||||||
| Re-releaser: | Kixx | ||||||||
| Copyright: | Tecmo | ||||||||
| Developer: | Probe Software | ||||||||
| Musician: | David Whittaker | ||||||||
| Information | |||||||||
| Main Control: | Joystick (Port 2) | ||||||||
| Players: | 1 Only | ||||||||
| Language: | English | ||||||||
| Retail Price: | £9.99 Tape £11.99 Disk | ||||||||
| Tape Loader | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
| Categorization | |||||||||
| Genre: | Shoot'em Up, H-Scrolling | ||||||||
| Tags: | Action, Side view, 2D scrolling, Fantasy | ||||||||
| Tie-In License | |||||||||
| Name: | Rygar: Legendary Warrior | ||||||||
| Type: | Arcade coin-op | ||||||||
| Owner: | Tecmo Ltd (Japan) | ||||||||
| Reference: | Rygar: Legendary Warrior on KLOV | ||||||||
| YouTube Links | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
| Magazine Reviews | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
Read review by Northlander
Graphics: 2 ‧
Music: 4 ‧
Playability: 2 ‧
Overall: 1
Of course this was expected, the controls will take some getting used to for arcade veterans but if you need to play Rygar and get a chance, try this version out. It’s not too bad.
A missed opportunity.
I fell in love with the music and still to this day, I love it.
nowdays I can still play this and enjoy it, its by no means perfect but I love the way it plays and the fact its quite tough to beat.
my rating is high, but I guess some games just grow on you!
The Arcade and Atari Lynx-versions are of course the best ones, but this Commodore 64 version is definitely below par.
I mean, how could they mess things up this bad, in the same year games like Maniac Mansion and Defender of the Crown were made? If they could create Shadow of the Beast for the C64, make Midnight Resistance really good, and make so many games look beautiful, why couldn't they do anything like that here?
I hate when this happens - a game appears on the C64 that proves that the authors were only thinking of money or schedules.
It's so sad to see games that exist as better versions on lesser systems, because they utilize only 10% of the C64's power.
This is in no way fair.
Still, Rygar was never a brilliant masterpiece to begin with, but it does bug me a heckuva lot sometimes, to see the potential of the magnificent C64 wasted like this. In the same vein, Ghouls'n'Ghosts could also have been a lot better.
On the NES, this kind of ugliness is the standard, of course, but on the C64, you'd expect something much better.
That said, the gameplay is quite good, and the musics are ok. But if I had to choose between this and Atari Lynx-version, I would go for the handheld version every time.
8/10
i have to rate 10/10