🍺 Buy Kim Lemon a beer - Support Lemon64

Get C64 Forever for revolutionary C64 emulation

1 / 3

Hillsfar

Hillsfar

Credits
Released: 1989 (35 years ago)
Publisher: Strategic Simulations Inc.Info / Logos
Copyright: TSR Inc.
Design: Brett Berry
Chuck KroegelInfo
Graeme Bayless
Producer: Westwood AssociatesInfo / Logos
Coder: Ethan Grimes
Kirk Fitzgerald
Graphics: Joseph Hewitt
Maurine Starkey
Musician: Paul MudraInfo
Information
Main Control:Joystick (Port 2)
Players:1 Only
Language:English
Retail Price:£19.99 Disk
Categorization
Genre:Adventure, RPG 3D
Tags:Action, 1st-person, Top-down, 2D scrolling, Real-time, Arcade, RPG elements, Fantasy, Licensed
Relationship
Misc relation:Champions of Krynn
Curse of the Azure Bonds
Death Knights of Krynn
Gateway to the Savage Frontier
Pool of Radiance
Secret of the Silver Blades
War of the Lance
Magazine Reviews
ACE, issue 21 (jun 89), p45
Release type is unknown
732/1000
Commodore User, issue 68 (may 89), p57
Strategic Simulations Inc. full-price release
80%
Zzap!64, issue 50 (jun 89), p81
Strategic Simulations Inc. full-price release
80%
Average magazine rating:
Based on 3 magazine reviews
78%

Rating

Score

from a total of 40 votes.

You must be logged in to vote.

Reviews

Read review by Steve Wilkins
Graphics: 7Music: 3Playability: 8Overall: 7

11 Comments

jasonp 2023-07-288/10 (8/10)
It's not really fair to compare this to the classic SSI RPGs, it's a different type of game. To me, with the tense dungeon action and town exploration and horse riding, it was one of the most immersive experiences on the C64. It was fine that there was no real story arc.
View all comments (14)
TDBauerTDBauer 2014-07-187/10 (7/10)
Played it, but didn't love it. Was a weak cross over game between Pools of Radiance and Curse of the Azure Bonds. It seemed like when reading about the game it had a lot of promise, but then it had some let down when you actually played it.
View all comments (86)
missilec64 2010-08-18
Well you either hated it or loved it. I loved it since when I wanted arcade and didn't want Pool I could play this. Worth playing just to see the minigames, which are a staple of modern rpgs these days. Best played as a sandbox game, breaking in and stealing from houses and mapping out the city.
View all comments (2)
scheebascheeba 2010-08-165/10 (5/10)
Very weak sauce compared to the 'proper' SSI rpgs. Pretty graphics but little else going for it.
View all comments (40)
Squatdog 2009-10-088/10 (8/10)
Hillsfar was a fun little game, with the added bonus that you coulduse your Pool of Radiance character and even level them up ingame(remember this was when Magic Users and Clerics were capped at lvl6).
View all comments (17)
mikeebeanmikeebean 2009-07-21
This was my first and only TSR/SSI game. I wish I'd tried the others before this one. It was a good starter game but it felt like a sampler, without any real plot. Maybe I missed something, but based on other reviews, I doubt it!
View all comments (6)
ozakozak 2005-10-284/10 (4/10)
I would agree on the suckiness of this game.
The promise was great, but it was just too damn repetitive :)
View all comments (10)
dandy 2004-02-27
This was a cool game in that you could create a specific character and take him solo adventuring in an urban setting. You could even transfer a character over from Pools of Radiance or Curse of the Azure Bonds. How cool is that? My half-elven fighter/thief was a real badass. It was cool going in the taverns and guilds with him, robbing houses, and getting my ass kicked in the arena by So-and-So the minotaur champion. My only gripe with this game was regardless of class or race your character always looked like the same, which was a human male fighter, regardless of whether you were man or woman, human, dwarf, elf, fighter, wizard, thief, or cleric. If only they had thrown in a few character models for variety this game would have been even better.
Remnant 2004-01-24
Can someone please tell me what the appeal is here? After buying and playing Pool of Radiance, which in my humble oppinion was one of the greatest games ever made, Hillsfar was a total let down. What was the piont to it? It had a few cheap action like segments (The Arena, Riding your horse to Hillsfar) and then what? Find your guild, wander through buildings which all looked alike looking for keys and gold, and then... Then... Then what?? There just wasn't anything to this game, especially after playing such a highly detailed and massive game like Pool, to which this game was supposed to be the sequel. You were apparantly also allowed to transfer a character from pool, and I don't even think that worked properly. I'd give this one a 4 out of 10.
ian 2002-12-24
I remember everyone having a hard-on for this game when it came out. Didn't like it though
Zorken 2002-05-26
To sum it up in one word.. Awsome! You create your own character as in any other Ad&d game.. Then you ride your horse into Hillsfar and there find your guild (different guilds depending on class). The graphics are just so well done. And the map/3d system works great.. It's huge and got a cozy atmosphere. A+ for this one..

Music

1 / 2

Scans

  • Hillsfar Front Cover scan
    Front Cover ‧ Disk ‧ 300 DPI
  • Hillsfar Magazine scan
    Magazine ‧ Commodore User ‧ 150 DPI

Other Platforms

Also released for DOS, PC-88 and PC-98.