 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Master of C64


Joined: 10 May 2012 Posts: 1294 Location: London
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Which is very bad for the environment as nothing was recycled.
Cars today are crap! My car was written off and my hire car was a brand new (only 150 miles) Mazda 323 AKA Ford Focus. Pure shit as a driving machine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Master of C64


Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Age: 40 Posts: 1097 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| C64Knight wrote: | | Cars today are crap! |
Oh, look, my grandpa's on here
I see both sides of this argument, with 2011 and 2012 model cars in our household I know the new stuff. On the other hand we have a 1964 Cadillac and a 1967 Cadillac too.
The difference between new and old is light years apart. So whilst my 1967 Cadillac has climate control A/C, cruise control, power windows, auto door locks, auto dimming headlights, electric seats, how well they function compared to a new car is very different. Not saying they are crap, they are just different.
Driving old cars is fun, it's a different mind set, you get in to a different zone and just appreciate them for what they are. With new cars there is unfortunately a lot of badge engineering going on these days so one make feels just like another when they start sharing engines, transmissions etc.
For general day to day usage I always choose the modern car (Cruze at the moment), for a highway drive on the weekend, nothing comes close to cruising in an old car, unless it's British, then you end up getting a lift home with the tow truck driver  _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Über Groupie


Joined: 07 Apr 2012 Age: 44 Posts: 308 Location: Braunschweig(Brunswick), Germany
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| vimfuego wrote: | | With new cars there is unfortunately a lot of badge engineering going on these days so one make feels just like another when they start sharing engines, transmissions etc. |
That's some kind of a funny comment by someone, who's driving vintage cars with the most commonly used engines and transmissions ever.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Immortal Grandmaster of C64


Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Age: 32 Posts: 3032 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I find the same thing with cameras. I have a large variety of them, you see. A modern full frame DSLR with a nice lens is great for actually taking photos, and a modern phone with a good camera on it gives you the ultimate in portability while retaining most of the function; but compare it to an older Polaroid camera, or another film camera (especially if you develop your own film), or even an older and nastier digital camera - and you'll find the 'weaker' stuff creates more of an experience. For special occasions, hell yes you'll want the older stuff, but for everyday use? It's a question of how lazy you are.
And I think vim's point is that virtually every manufacturer has a standard platform on which most of their cars are based - VW mostly base theirs on Golfs, Nissan mostly base theirs on Micras (why?), and so on. But true, transmissions are pretty much the same throughout time - any car of the same age will likely have the same old transmission, and if anything, in the last decade or so we have a bit more diversity with things like DSG, dual clutch, etc.
Personally I drive a Hyundai i30, auto diesel. Love it. Everyone who gets in it loves it and most who see it love it. It's a great all-rounder for a great price. It's still worth as much as when I bought it 18 months ago due to it being a small-ish diesel car, I have no intention to sell it anyway, and I'm not up to my ears in debt on it. It's great!
If I was going to get a weekend car...assuming I can't afford another car of the same value? Probably a Nissan/Datsun 280Z. I just love old coupes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Master of C64


Joined: 10 May 2012 Posts: 1294 Location: London
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK when I say crap I should expand on this more.
I am not talking about build quality or reliability or even how many miles per gallon you do. I am talking about gearbox's with the kind of precision a Terminator would admire, a clutch that gives real feeling, an accelerator that does not feel like a piece of string attached to a little spring, a set of brakes that are truly progressive. Oh and weight, the battle of the bulge in new cars is how hideously and grossly overweight they are. Each generation just becomes bigger and heavier and bloated (just like Windows!) and as anyone who has studied physics will appreciate when it comes to handling, changing the direction of momentum is harder regardless of how much bigger and more powerful the engine is.
Also I am not saying 70s cars are better than cars sold in 2000, I am more on about the cars being sold today which have been bloated up and dumbed down (sharpness in handling) to a point where I would rather ride a mountain bike to the shops than a new Ford Fiesta from 2011
My car that was written off was from 2000, but it had exactly the same awesome steering/brakes/clutch/gearbox feel of the spiritual predecessor from 1988 that I owned in the early 1990s (that actually costs 200-300% more to buy). The new model from 2007 looks like a Toyota shopping trolley and handles so benign there is a danger of falling asleep at the wheel  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Master of C64


Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Age: 40 Posts: 1097 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| akabei wrote: | That's some kind of a funny comment by someone, who's driving vintage cars with the most commonly used engines and transmissions ever.  |
Not quite, back in the 60's GM USA's many divisions, eg, Cadillac, Buick, Chevrolet, Pontiac all had their own engine designs, the engine in my car isn't a small block Chev (if that is what you were getting at).
| C64Knight wrote: | | Each generation just becomes bigger and heavier and bloated (just like Windows!) and as anyone who has studied physics will appreciate when it comes to handling, changing the direction of momentum is harder regardless of how much bigger and more powerful the engine is. |
Yes it is amazing how heavy new cars are, the 'little' Cruze I have weighs 3,200lb, that is nearly as heavy as the classic 1957 Chevrolet!! It all comes down to safety and crash re-enforcements, check this out....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joMK1WZjP7g _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Über Groupie


Joined: 07 Apr 2012 Age: 44 Posts: 308 Location: Braunschweig(Brunswick), Germany
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| vimfuego wrote: | | akabei wrote: | That's some kind of a funny comment by someone, who's driving vintage cars with the most commonly used engines and transmissions ever.  |
Not quite, back in the 60's GM USA's many divisions, eg, Cadillac, Buick, Chevrolet, Pontiac all had their own engine designs, the engine in my car isn't a small block Chev (if that is what you were getting at).
| C64Knight wrote: | | Each generation just becomes bigger and heavier and bloated (just like Windows!) and as anyone who has studied physics will appreciate when it comes to handling, changing the direction of momentum is harder regardless of how much bigger and more powerful the engine is. |
Yes it is amazing how heavy new cars are, the 'little' Cruze I have weighs 3,200lb, that is nearly as heavy as the classic 1957 Chevrolet!! It all comes down to safety and crash re-enforcements, check this out....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joMK1WZjP7g |
Yes, you're right, I was referring to the small block V8 and you're right with the rest of your statement(wasn't the small Rover V8 a development by Buick?). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
C64 Enthusiast

Joined: 20 Jun 2004 Posts: 767
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grandmaster of C64


Joined: 12 May 2010 Age: 36 Posts: 2270 Location: perth australia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
toyota aurion, honda accord euro, subaru liberty are the 2nd best cars on the australian market, they are actually the best right now if new..... commodore and falcon are actually the best, my reasoning:
toyota, honda, and subaru are smooth and tight, fuel effient and very good build quality but..... japanese parts are expensive, and when something really goes wrong outside of warranty you better have deep pockets!!! dont get me wrong great cars but do you want to breakdown in a little country town down south on a sunday afternoon???
falcon and commodore, smooth, but not as smooth as the japanese cars, build quality much improved in the last decade, parts galore, cheaper insurance and better suited to aussie climate. not to forget collectable!
cruze is a ripper! out sells commodore and a real treat to drive.
hyundai, kia, daewoo, cherry, great wall, proton, geelee..... sorry guys i dont care how good they supposedly are, theres just no way im driving them! they look rubbish and especially hyundai and kia are way over priced! i mean hey why why, would i consider buying an i45 or optima when i can have a brand new honda accord euro for less??? mannnnnn! the accord euro is an amazingly awesome ride for $29999!!! kia optima $30999??? nah i dont think so! i45 $32990??? you have to be kidding!!! _________________ raid over moscow does my head in! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grandmaster of C64


Joined: 29 Jun 2009 Age: 40 Posts: 2615 Location: Baltimore, MD Favorite Games: Ultima ][, Wasteland
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| retrogamer-downunder wrote: | | hyundai, kia, daewoo, cherry, great wall, proton, geelee..... sorry guys i dont care how good they supposedly are, theres just no way im driving them! they look rubbish and especially hyundai and kia are way over priced! i mean hey why why, would i consider buying an i45 or optima when i can have a brand new honda accord euro for less??? mannnnnn! the accord euro is an amazingly awesome ride for $29999!!! kia optima $30999??? nah i dont think so! i45 $32990??? you have to be kidding!!! |
I bought my Nissan Cube (Last years model) in 2010. Brand new cost me $14,999 USD + taxes and tags. Almost fully loaded (keyless entry, push button start, VDC)... Everything offered but the GPS head unit. It came with a CD player with an I-Pod jack (which I use all the time). I took it both times I went to the C4 Expo. Which is a a quite a drive from Baltimore, MD to Kentucky (in the US).
brain,
I owned a pop-up and a friend has a light weight. I hear Disney does a fantastic camping experience. FYI.
http://disneyworld.disney.go.c...ss-resort/ _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Master of C64


Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Age: 40 Posts: 1097 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| retrogamer-downunder wrote: | | toyota, honda, and subaru are smooth and tight, fuel effient and very good build quality but..... |
Only in Australia is Honda considered a 'prestige' brand, I've never understood why. I've driven an Accord Euro and was not impressed (for the price they ask for them). _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Master of C64


Joined: 10 May 2012 Posts: 1294 Location: London
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Honda's are built quite nicely I agree. Not so happy about the woolly steering and spongy brakes
(this may have changed since the 2002 Accord I drove) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grandmaster of C64


Joined: 12 May 2010 Age: 36 Posts: 2270 Location: perth australia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the 2012 accord euro drives very nicely, steering is vastly improved. _________________ raid over moscow does my head in! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Über Groupie


Joined: 07 Apr 2012 Age: 44 Posts: 308 Location: Braunschweig(Brunswick), Germany
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe I'm biased, cause I'm german, but nobody can tell me a Chevy/Daewoo/or what those korean cars are called in australia/ Cruze is a slick and nice car. I know, they improved a lot over the past years and maybe they are as good as a Seat, Peugeot or Skoda here in europe, but that's it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Master of C64


Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Age: 40 Posts: 1097 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| akabei wrote: | | Maybe I'm biased, cause I'm german, but nobody can tell me a Chevy/Daewoo/or what those korean cars are called in australia/ Cruze is a slick and nice car. I know, they improved a lot over the past years and maybe they are as good as a Seat, Peugeot or Skoda here in europe, but that's it. |
The early Cruze was indeed Korean built crap, however since about 2010 (I think) they use an engine from Austria (the 1.4L Turbo), it's DeltaII platform (though a 'world design') was primarily designed by Opel. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Opel is German right?
For yourself in Germany you might compare the Cruze to a 1 or 3 series BMW, but here in Australia those cars are insanely priced. For example, a 2012 120i BMW is around $60,000 (47,000 Eur). A fully loaded Cruze (which has lots of gadgets) is under $30,000. _________________
Last edited by vimfuego on Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:39 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grandmaster of C64


Joined: 12 May 2010 Age: 36 Posts: 2270 Location: perth australia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the cruze is a nice car, i particularly like the sri turbo, but i cant understand why they havent made an all wheel drive rally version! man that would be awesome! compete against wrx! _________________ raid over moscow does my head in! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Master of C64


Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Age: 40 Posts: 1097 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| retrogamer-downunder wrote: | | the cruze is a nice car, i particularly like the sri turbo, but i cant understand why they havent made an all wheel drive rally version! man that would be awesome! compete against wrx! |
I don't think it was intended as a performance car. The idea behind the 1.4L turbo was excellent fuel economy with a bit more go when needed. The turbo is really small and they run pretty low boost.
I don't know about a 4WD version, but there is a 2.0L Turbo version in the USA - Buick Verano, it shares the same platform as the Cruze, so who knows what might come down the line in years to come. But I think it's fair to say that the whole 'WRX & Evo' thing has really died off (in Australia at least). The WRX's were everywhere 10 years ago, now, I hardly see any. Speed camera's on every corner and crazy insurance prices took care of that. _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Über Groupie


Joined: 07 Apr 2012 Age: 44 Posts: 308 Location: Braunschweig(Brunswick), Germany
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't understand, why they don't release a WTCC replica. If I remember correctly, the Cruze won the last two world championship titles and are already way in front this year.
Here are some pics.
btw: Yes, Opel is german, but it's almost dead. About 15 years ago, they hired a spanish manager, who pressurised the component suppliers a lot, leading to an immense loss of quality. Opel's image is still suffering from this period, though their cars aren't that bad anymore. There are rumours, GM will close the Opel factory in Bochum soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Master of C64


Joined: 10 May 2012 Posts: 1294 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| akabei wrote: | | Maybe I'm biased, cause I'm german, but nobody can tell me a Chevy/Daewoo/or what those korean cars are called in australia/ Cruze is a slick and nice car. I know, they improved a lot over the past years and maybe they are as good as a Seat, Peugeot or Skoda here in europe, but that's it. |
I won't argue with that, I have owned 20 German cars in my time, and most are the executive toy rear wheel drive category and in most cases, a few blips from BMW/Mercedes now and then, are not only well designed and put together but they are over engineered too. Sure a Ford Focus gearbox works, but it feels like I am driving a truck in the 200bhp models. A 2.8L BMW Coupe with 200bhp also however has a gearbox that just feels like you're using a precision tool like a surgeon to achieve your goal.
Having said that, some of the older cars just have a huge amount of torque and zero anti sqaut/dive dialled into their suspension geometry and so feel more "fun" in some ways.....guess it's the whole controlling something that is out of control panacea of design no? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Master of C64


Joined: 10 May 2012 Posts: 1294 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| vimfuego wrote: | | C64Knight wrote: | | Each generation just becomes bigger and heavier and bloated (just like Windows!) and as anyone who has studied physics will appreciate when it comes to handling, changing the direction of momentum is harder regardless of how much bigger and more powerful the engine is. |
Yes it is amazing how heavy new cars are, the 'little' Cruze I have weighs 3,200lb, that is nearly as heavy as the classic 1957 Chevrolet!! It all comes down to safety and crash re-enforcements, check this out....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joMK1WZjP7g |
Not all of it, maybe 1/3 of it. The rest is just to increase cabin space and also a cheap trick of making a small car heavier makes it feel more luxurious because suspension setup for ride quality on a small car is just as hard as making a BMW 7 series go round corners quickly. Some companies have genuine improvements, cheap nasty cars have weight added and the same crap suspension design as everyone else. It comes down to unsprung weight as well and the ratio of sprung weight:unsprung weight on the car too.
Short version, it's a cheap fix
I don't mind about for example heavier doors because they have integral crash protection systems inside for side impacts but the fact that the new Ford Fiesta in 2 generations has become the size of the car above (Focus) is not really to do with crash protection, because the Focus also increases in size too. So why not keep the Focus at the same size if the Fiesta at its new size is Encap approved?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Master of C64


Joined: 10 May 2012 Posts: 1294 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Did anyone drive any of them marketing inspired 4x4 cars in the 80s/90s?
For example Peugeot 405 4x4, Vauxhall Cavalier 4x4 or the BMW 325x (x=4x4 lol)
They were more of a basic 4x4 to cash in on the buzz of safety via the Audi Quattro line's technology, but far less sophisticated.
We get one day of snow a year if we are lucky where I live so it's not really a requirement where I live. I walk to the shops to get my tobacco on that one day a year  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Master of C64


Joined: 10 May 2012 Posts: 1294 Location: London
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Über Groupie


Joined: 07 Apr 2012 Age: 44 Posts: 308 Location: Braunschweig(Brunswick), Germany
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks nice.
I guess the Knudsen Taunus by Ford Cologne is the german counterpart of it( some pics here), but the best motor was a 2.3l V6 with 107 hp, so it's no real rival. It's hard to find one in decent condition, so the prices are quite high. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Master of C64


Joined: 10 May 2012 Posts: 1294 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Coupe/fastback body
I would stick a V8 in one, possibly Buick/Rover V8. They should take the V6 3L Turbo from the Tickford edition of Ford Capri but that would cost more and I'd rather have the V8 rumble
Rare here too, most have 4 doors which are not my thing, others way OTT bad taste mods IMO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Groupie


Joined: 06 Jan 2002 Age: 41 Posts: 242 Location: Deepest rural Norfolk
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| C64Knight wrote: | The hunt is on for a 'cheap' one  |
Haha good luck with that. 'Cheap' and 'classic 70's Ford' really don't go together in the same sentence.
Not in the UK at least...
(Thought you wanted a GT6?) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Tip: Get C64 Forever for super-comfy C64 emulation with pre-installed games, demos and other goodies!
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|